tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4368063802610066230.post687360630226563433..comments2023-05-04T05:07:21.322-07:00Comments on Man With Questions: My head hurts...Drewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02463623927983492891noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4368063802610066230.post-24481427590429870732007-04-30T12:41:00.000-07:002007-04-30T12:41:00.000-07:00Drew,I would agree with that last statement. That...Drew,<BR/><BR/>I would agree with that last statement. That's why I don't try to understand it. I just accept it. =o)Jeremy@Life of an Anthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00193716080410293395noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4368063802610066230.post-48549792737839396592007-04-23T09:44:00.000-07:002007-04-23T09:44:00.000-07:00I would say they are synonomous.Isn't it strange t...I would say they are synonomous.<BR/><BR/>Isn't it strange to try and understand how time or reality have always existed?<BR/><BR/>As mortals it almost seems necessary and natural to put a beginning and end to something in order to understand it.Drewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02463623927983492891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4368063802610066230.post-13942800873442729292007-04-22T21:39:00.000-07:002007-04-22T21:39:00.000-07:00An alternative version:Time has always existed. It...An alternative version:<BR/><BR/>Time has always existed. It has no beginning. It has no end.<BR/><BR/>A beginning to time signifies a time without time. Out of a void time could not be born.<BR/><BR/>An ending to time signifies a void future. Therefore, time would have never existed.<BR/><BR/>It is tough for me to define reality, so I substituted a different word into your statement. Perhaps "reality" and "time" are synonomous.Aaronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15567302987586127101noreply@blogger.com